I've been eating out a lot recently due to my commute and other factors, and it occurred to me one evening that in some ways, eating out can be more green than cooking at home. Now, I'm not talking about going to McDonald's and getting something highly packaged and of dubious taste and nutritional value. I'm talking about eating at a neighborhood restaurant, where you aren't driving much, if at all, to get to it, and where you are served on china, not in a styrofoam box.
The logic behind my thinking is this: the restaurants are buying foodstuffs with much less packaging than in the grocery stores, their equipment is being to feed many, many people, increasing the efficiency of the fossil fuels used to cook it (I am assuming, although I could be wrong, that the cost/use per meal of gas/electric in a restaurant is lower than in a home kitchen). Mostly I am thinking in terms of packaging and distribution - instead of everyone driving to the store to buy food in little packages (many of which are not easily recyclable), then driving home, instead people walking to the corner pub and eating a sandwich (accompanied by a pint, of course!), may be more ecologically sound. Or maybe I had one too many Grey Goose sours when I thought of this. Am I just trying to justify my growing habit of joining my DH's co-workers for a drink and dinner at the local bar & grill? I'm sure I'm forgetting something - what are your thoughts on this subject?
I think the idea of the minutiae of the carbon footprint can't be accurately broken down in small quantities.
Who is more likely to have raspberries on the menu in January? Who has more food waste? Is using a big, unregulated truck to deliver better or worse than using a car with emission controls?
Does the local get its' product locally?
And so on.
You do what you can, and think about how do more and enjoy your life.
Posted by: BeckyH | January 28, 2009 at 11:45 AM
Walking is good, and it sounds like a great way to meet the new neighbors and make some friends. Is the cost of food, from the market or in the pub, substantially different (less) than on the East Coast? Yeah, I still count the hills of West Virginia as the East Coast.
At least you are doing your bit for the economy!
Posted by: East Coast | January 28, 2009 at 03:14 PM
Hmmm. Having worked in a restaurant, I'd say you're kidding yourself.
The amount of electricity and gas used by restaurants is multiple times what you'd use at home. Also, unless you're going to a place which advertises loccal organic food, most restaurants get most of their ingredients from many questionable sources, including ones you wouldn't consider buying. And then there's the *laundry*.
Posted by: TheFuzzyChef | February 02, 2009 at 11:58 PM